Diving into the depths of the communications world…discussing current events and trends affecting the ever evolving PR profession.
T.M.I. (Too Much Information) is often a comment attached to status updates on Facebook, Myspace ,Twitter and similar sites. Users are often accused of posting excessive personal information on these networking websites. Perhaps one may update their status to innocently notify their friends of the latest going-ons in their life. Everyone from your butcher to your first crush from kindergarten is on Facebook, and it’s interesting to connect.
In an ever advancing technological age, blogging is no longer a privilege of the web savvy. In its condensed form (about 140 characters), blogging is a quick and fun way to let people know what you are doing or thinking at any given moment. A micro cerebral snapshot, if you will. All harmless, right? Well, not while ‘Big Brother’ is watching, which is apparently- all the time.
Kimberly Swann, a young Brit, is enjoying her 15 minutes of fame as a result of such an online indulgence. Swann joined the multitudes of unemployed when her boss discovered, via her Facebook status, that she was “bored at work”. How many times per week (or even per day) do you post similar updates? Would you have thought it’s an offence that could get you sacked?!
On these sites, I’m sure many have said far worse about their place of work. Should they watch out for their jobs too? Where does one draw the line between freedom of expression and insubordination/ incompetence? Was the real issue here her “boredom” or perusing Facebook while she was supposed to be working? Or both?
Embedded video from CNN Video
In this amusing CNN segment, a journalist carries out a search for the key words “bored” and “work” on the uber- popular (not to mention highly addictive) Facebook and Twitter. Unsurprisingly, many share Swann’s lack of enthusiasm.
According to Kimberly’s boss, her candid revelation of Facebook was a clear indication that she “wasn’t happy” there and consequently “it wasn’t going to work out.” The question that we should all be asking is how her boss found out about her status in the first place, on company time might I add. Was he “bored” too?
For reasons foreign to most journalists, young graduates still flock to PR. It is among their top three favourite professions, according to the Institute of Public Relations (IPR), which estimates that 48,000 people work in it. It doesn’t stop there- growing numbers of people are switching jobs into PR. In the last 2 years, there has seen a rapid growth in PR with the number of journalists taking a dive.
After years of watching the hit TV series, Sex and the City, and idolizing the publicist- Samantha Jones, I can understand the attraction. Samantha owns her own Public Relations company, and schmoozes with the who’s who New York City. She is privy to all the best hot spots in the city and has a phonebook overflowing with names and numbers of the crème de la crème of New York’s elite. Ooh la la!
Everyone ‘knows’ about PR – and that it seems to consist mainly of going to parties and having your photo taken, like Meg Gallagher – but it’s not all parties and glamour, dahling! In fact, PR can be a glitz-free zone – hard work, with regular rejection sewn in. The mainstream perception propagated by Ab Fab and Peter Mandelson, do a disservice to the other part of the industry, which is really about a lot of toil and honesty.
The growth of the industry comes as no surprise with PRs now sitting on the board of directors, demonstrating that these communicators make a real impact. Once scarce PR education(now offered at diploma, Bachelors and Masters level) has become valuable asserting PR as a strategic tool and management function.
The increasing power of the media through Web 2.0 has led to understanding of the link between reputation, success and survival. Today, PR is finally recognised as a career that will offer bona fide responsibility and significance.
The public’s obsession with celebrities seems to know no bounds.
Entertainment industry publications b.k.a tabloids such as the National Enquirer in the US and OK! in the UK, keep churning out the latest and greatest about the hottest celebrities around. TV channels solely dedicated to this, such as the popular E!, record consistently high ratings. International celebrity focused sites such as TMZ and People have users logging on daily for up-to-the-minute gossip.
A variety of these publications use exclamation marks on their covers to describe the divorces, pregnancies, affairs, eating disorders and assorted depravities of the same small group of celebrities. The modus operandi for cramming content into these publications has been standardised: spotting cellulite, tracking breast augmentation and all around liposuction…a scuffle for scoops bought from gossipy stylists, bouncers and choreographers and a bit of slavish grovelling in the “exclusive interview.”
I believe that the UK’s interest in celebrities began as a pleasurable pastime, but steadily grew into a detrimental fixation. The internet, and in particular the emergence of user-generated content like blogs, MySpace and YouTube – generally characterised as Web 2.0 – has taken that curiosity to a whole new level.
Web 2.0 is not only feeding an unhealthy obsession with celebrity, but it has provided a whole new platform for the creation of celebrities. A good example is Paris Hilton, who had no more claim to fame than inherited wealth. She came to global attention with the appearance of her sex tape on the internet.
Web developers are taking advantage of this obsession, by launching platforms such as YoBusted. On this website, users can pretend to be as famous and glamorous as celebrities by uploading candid pictures and video of their wanna-be ‘fast paced’ lifestyle. Days later, they can type their name in any major search engine (i.e., Google Yahoo, etc.), and the party pictures and videos will show up at the top of the search engine results for the world to see. In a launch press release the YoBusted.com’s President explains, “What TMZ and US Magazine are to Hollywood, we are to the rest of us. Think your professor, boss or classmate is a straight-edge? He’s probably a wild cat too, just check YoBusted.com!”
We live in a celebrity obsessed age- so much so that there is even a term for it. Celebrity worship syndrome was first identified as an addictive disorder in 2003. In a media saturated environment, research shows as many as 10% of the public are developing unhealthy obsessions with celebrities which can lead to depression, anxiety and psychosis. Psychologists term this condition as celebrity worship syndrome – or, even worse, celebrity erotomania, a delusion that a star is in love with you.
I believe the focus of the arts and entertainment business should be on the work that these famous athletes, actors and musicians produce, not what they do in their private life. In my opinion, it is much more interesting and relevant to learn about an upcoming movie or album from a celebrity rather than speculation about a secret lover or a drug addiction. Problems and flaws are their own business and the personal lives of celebrities should not be constantly invaded.
But in the end, despite my moral qualms on the matter, this situation is not likely to change. The media are simply meeting a persistent and (sadly) growing demand.